Four Blind Spots of a Technical Leader
They master the code but miss the code behind the code: the human operating system that actually runs their team.
It was a Tuesday standup.
Sarah, our backend engineer, was walking through her approach to the payment system architecture.
I cut in.
“Event sourcing would be cleaner. We can avoid the whole concurrency issue.”
Silence.
Sarah’s hand, still pointing at the whiteboard, slowly dropped.
I was the new engineering manager. Brought in to “level up” the team. And I was doing what I did best: proving I was the smartest person in the room.
But in that moment, something broke. And no amount of refactoring could fix it.
Here’s what I learned the hard way:
1. Enable Thinking
Six months in, my calendar was flooded with architecture reviews.
Engineers wouldn’t make major decisions without my approval.
I felt powerful. Important. Needed.
Then our delivery slowed to a crawl.
Every decision bottlenecked at my desk. Every problem waited for me to solve it.
I wasn’t leading. I was hoarding control.
The shift happened when I stopped answering and started asking:
“What edge cases concern you?”
“Where do you think this might break?”
“What makes you confident in this approach?”
And just like that, my team started thinking beyond my answers.
Takeaway: Your expertise is borrowed authority. Real leadership is helping others build their own.
2. Let Failure Teach
"That won't scale."
"This needs to be more modular."
"We should use a different pattern here."
Technical feedback feels productive. Safe. Necessary.
But every time you jump to the right answer, you rob your team of the wrong answers they need to grow.
I once worked with a senior engineer who could solve complex problems in minutes. His solutions were fast, precise, and completely useless for teaching others.
The team’s code got better. The team’s growth flatlined.
Takeaway: Not every bug needs fixing. Some need failing.
3. Monitor Psychological Throughput
Engineers track everything—latency, uptime, deploy frequency.
But the most critical metric is invisible: Psychological Throughput.
How fast do ideas flow before fear creates a bottleneck?
On paper, our team’s technical metrics were flawless:
✅ 98% test coverage
✅ 12 deploys per day
✅ < 2-hour time to merge
But in reality?
My best engineers were operating at 5% of their creative capacity.
Every architecture discussion felt like a defense hearing. Every code review read like an interrogation.
I had built a high-performance engine but forgot to lay the tracks of trust.
The shift happened when I made psychological safety a system requirement:
✔ Celebrated failed experiments
✔ Made "I don't know" a badge of courage
✔ Turned code reviews into explorations, not trials
And suddenly—our psychological throughput skyrocketed.
Takeaway: You can’t scale engineering output without scaling psychological safety first.
4. Avoid Growth Debt
Engineering leaders obsess over technical debt.
But here’s what’s really suffocating your team: Growth Debt.
Every time you solve a problem your team could have solved, you’re adding to it. Every time you flex your technical superiority, you’re paying compound interest on stunted growth.
I learned this when a junior engineer came to me with a complex caching issue.
My fingers itched to jump in.
Instead, I asked: "This is a tough one. How do you want to tackle it?"
Three days later, she solved it—and taught two other engineers in the process.
My solution would’ve taken 10 minutes.
Her growth took 3 days.
Best trade I ever made.
Takeaway: Technical debt has a sprint deadline. Growth debt compounds over careers.
In Summary:
Great engineering leaders don’t own every solution.
They build the environment where solutions emerge.
While others optimize code, they optimize team courage.
While others refactor functions, they refactor beliefs.
While others debug systems, they debug trust.
Because, at the end of the day, your success isn’t measured in pull requests. It’s measured in the psychological safety of your team.
The next time you’re tempted to be the smartest person in the room, remember:
The best leaders don’t write the best code. They code the best culture.
Follow me on LinkedIn for daily insights shared with 70,000+ incredible minds.
If you’re looking to grow your career, here are three ways I can help you:
The Resume Ghostbuster: Join 5,000+ people who’ve transformed their resumes into recruiter magnets. Use the robust AI script to transform your resume into the template of your choice. Includes LinkedIn profile update and job search strategies.
The Top Engineer Method: Join 1,000+ engineers in my flagship course.
The Top Engineer Method teaches you frameworks for getting unstuck in your career by showcasing your work, building relationships, and handling work politics with confidence. Come learn to grow your influence, get promoted faster, and stay focused on solving the problems that matter.The Top Tech Leader Method: Join 500+ engineering leaders across the globe inside the Top Tech Leader Method. This comprehensive course will teach you the methods I used to lead high-performing teams, influence executives, and grow into an engineering executive at top-tier tech companies.
Great post
Absolutely. The effectiveness of any leader is not measured by what they do alone, but by what they enable others to achieve.